Saheed Afeez Ayinde

Purposely the main objective of the court is to dispense untainted JUSTICE to the aggrieved with neither overtly nor covertly dispensed. Hence the court has the care to utilize all available elements including the court  bailiffs in attaining the aimed justice.

Thence, court bailiffs have been saddled with their roles in ensuring the untainted JUSTICE whose failure to discharge will cause unnecessary delay in the administration of Justice

As stated in this case 

Odutola Vs kayode (1996) 2 NWLR

Per Olatawura, JSC (of blessed memory)

Where personal service is ordered, he must serve that person personally. Where a substituted service either by pasting at the last known abode of the person required to be served, or by publication in a newspaper is ordered, any other service which is not in accordance with the clear and unambiguous language of the Court is ineffectual.

Bailiffs are ofiicers of the Court. Any dereliction of duty in the discharge of their duties will cause unnecessary delay in the administration of justice. A false return of service on the part of the bailiff may lead to an attempt to deceive the Court. This in itself is an abuse of that order

Expositions Legal

deemlawful View All →

Educational || Motivational || Legal || Public Speaker || Professional || Activist ||

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: